Media Talk

Twitter Updates

    Twitter follow me on Twitter
    Recommended Picks
    More recommended titles in our aStore...
    Google Ads
    Seeking Alpha Certified

    « Fourth Quarter Box Office Off To A Good Start | Main | Will Internet Bypass Hurt Cable? Not Anytime Soon »

    October 22, 2006

    NBC's Strategic Changes: The Future of Network TV?

    I think the money quote from last Thursday's widely discussed article on steep cost cutting at NBC Universal came from Bob Wright: “As we reprioritize ourselves toward digital, we’ve got to be as efficient in our current business as possible.” The reality is that analog is under pressure due to continuing moderate viewership declines, alternative distribution channels like the internet and iPods, and ad-skipping friendly digital video recorders. The big TV networks have long been able to offset sliding ratings with prices increases but recent trends suggest that the additional challenges of digital technologies has finally restored balance to the pricing battle and CPM growth has stalled....

    NBC’s response is a massive cost cutting program design t save $750 million against projected 2006 revenue and operating profits of $16.5 billion and $3 billion, respectively. The cost cutting is supposed to be across the board but it appears that primetime programming expenses, particularly in the first hour, and news will bear the brunt.

    As far as saving money on programming, NBC wants to have more reality type programming in the opening hour of prime time. The Peacock network trails its rivals at CBS, ABC, and Fox in this regard, so I’d view this partially as a catch-up move and not a groundbreaking announcement. That said, entertainment executives do seem to recognize that the economics of content production breakdown as talent and other production costs soar while pricing power dissipates.

    On news, there have been cutbacks for years and rumors of massive changes such as a joint venture between CNN and the news divisions of ABC, CBS, or NBC. The reality is that the internet handles news better than TV except for breaking news on big stories. Maintaining a huge news gathering and content distribution system just doesn’t make sense as consumers increasingly turn to the internet for timely and accurate reporting.

    This story is likely to reignite the debate about how TV is headed the way of music, newspapers, and radio. The acquisition of YouTube by Google (GOOG) merely reinforces this view. However, I maintain that TV viewing habits are much more deeply ingrained and that the alternatives are much worse substitutes that is the case for these other traditional media. Consequently, I expect the erosion of TV economics be much more gradual than has been the case for newspapers and radio, especially the recent acceleration in challenges faced by those industries.

    Additionally, the TV networks are owned by the same companies that are the content suppliers so unlike radio or newspapers, the transition to new distribution channels opens up a revenue opportunity. I don’t think selling ads on ABC.com of selling shows on iTunes for $1.99 can make up for the loss of pricing power on network TV, but it does provide a growing revenue stream against the slow erosion in network TV economics. You can’t say the same thing for newspapers or radio.

    When the YouTube generation ages by 10 or 15 years, the economics of TV might breakdown more rapidly. For now, it will be periodic shifts in sentiment that hurt the stocks. But sentiment swings widely on Wall Street so don’t get overly concerned if the death of TV becomes a big story again for a few months.

    Posted by Steve Birenberg at October 22, 2006 05:11 PM in Media

    Comments

    Steve,
    Thanks for the NBC update. It really is the first wave of big change in the media business. I'm not sure where it is going and if I did I would have a really great new company. The industry has got itself a big problem. They need to support the current model of advertiser buying media to show their :15, :30, :60 commercial. Most big advertising agency's are all set up to support this type of model as well and are slow to adjust. However, there are many more distraction taking people away from regular TV viewing habits. As the internet speed increases and one can basically see anything at anytime by just a download - On Demand Entertainment. What is going to be the Media company revenue model with advertisers? Once you download, Tivo, screen DVD's what is going to stop the viewer from just skipping advertisements to get back to the show? The Advertisers and The Ad Agency need to be thinking about how they are going to connect with their consumers differently if their mainstream :30 commercial becomes secondary.

    Posted by: NC at November 2, 2006 11:34 AM

    Good questions and ones that are hodling back the performance of ad supported media stocks.

    I think that there will be ads on the web content where the viewer is watching on a company owned website, say CBS.com. As far as DVR's and downloads go, the networks are negotiating very hard with advertisers to get paid something for DVR viewership. This came up on CBS conference call today with Les Moonves firmly stating that CBS would get paid. We'll see. The problem is that while I believe that these new viewer otpiosn will generate revenue they won't generate as much as ultimatleyleaves when advertising on netwrok TV starts sliding (as it has doen already for newspapers and radio). So I don't really know the answer. Fortunately, from my perch I just have to analyze the stocks and when I see this level of uncertainty the right move is usual to not own the stocks.

    Posted by: Steve at November 2, 2006 04:17 PM
    Post a comment









    Remember personal info?




    Verification (needed to reduce spam):



    © 2012 Northlake Capital Management | 1604 Chicago Avenue Suite 4
    Evanston, IL 60201 | 847-226-9713 | info@northlakecapital.com

    privacy policy | site design by windy city sites

     

    Nothlake Home Media Talk Home